Re: Side-effect involving mailing lists
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rick Moen wrote: > I'll admit to being a bit lazy in this, so feel welcome to tell me "Read > Your Friendly exim4.conf File" or "Read the Friendly Pipermail Archive" > -- but this might at least be mildly entertaining. [...] > What I'm curious about is: What's a reasonable way to deal with this > problem? I'm tempted to label the "problem" serendipitous, and conclude > that spam-permissive listadmins _should_ be teergrubed into oblivion, > but what do people do for spam-permissive mailing lists they want to > read, not get spam from, and not get thrown off on account of teergrubing > them? Thanks for a witty and amusing piece.Though I was ensnared by SA-Exim's teergrubing at first, I found out that using it simply goes paired with that feeling of gratification it gives. In the end I found that it causes more mutual harm than good, though. Just make sure that you don't subscribe to mailing lists that also use gmane or whatever to publish to usenet - at least not with your regular email address and the strategy you've outlined. The Swen and Mimail hords are far much more worth worrying about than the odd mailing-list spam - and you can't teergrube anyone who cares who's sending you those bots. You court them by visiting dirty places, or if you're a Windows ingenue, you just click. --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw If my mail server refuses your mail (Swen attack), resend to: [email protected] http: www.billy.demon.nl