Re: SA-Exim vs. ExiScan - at an initial glance
Nigel Metheringham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin,gmane.mail.exim.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | InTechnology plc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 22:30, Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Specifically, from a superficial glance, these are the strengths of
> ExiScan (as compared to SA-Exim):
Actually the one reason I have Sa-Exim in use (as well as exiscan) is:-
* SA-Exim can modify the message to add SpamAssassin's body markup
and original message encapsulation.
I do wonder how easy it would be to take a message that has header
markup only and encapsulate it, producing the SA body report - this
could easily be done in a transport if the basic encapsulator was
available without a full re-run of SA.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [email protected] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]