RE: sa-exim 2.2 feedback?

Well I've been using sa-exim for about 1 week.  I have no experience with
any of the other versions but here are my experiences:

I started with a very aggressive score of 5.6,  This was stopping a lot of
crap but unfortunately it did stop some valid emails that were generated by
Air canada's ticket reciept/Itenery Generator as well as some other emails,
so I raised the score to 8.  I'm still stopping a lot of crap though!
Although some crap has scored under. 
I was thinking about teergrubbing but I was not sure about what sort of
performance it would cost our mail hub?  I imagine none since it would be
doing nothing but stalling, but was not sure.

I'm extremely pleased with the results though.
Thanx for all your work Marc.

Cheers,
Ariel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc MERLIN [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [SA-exim] sa-exim 2.2 feedback?
> 
> 
> I'm curious how many people are using sa-exim 2.2 vs the ones 
> that just
> got whichever version worked for them back then and stuck with it :-)
> 
> I'm getting  pretty good results  with teergrubing and enjoy  
> reading my
> logs to see how  much I held up spammers on  a daily basis. 
> I'm actually
> surprised by how many spams score 25 or more and generate a teergrube.
> 
> How about you guys, any good bad experiences with this?
> (I've  had a  few pileups  but  those were  due  to SA  
> hanging and  not
> honoring the timeouts it was supposed to set)
> 
> Marc
> -- 
> "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to 
> type in" - A.S.R.
> Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
>                                       .... what McDonalds is 
> to gourmet cooking 
> Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/   |   Finger 
> [email protected] for PGP key
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SA-Exim mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
>