Re: sa-exim cvs with greylisting support

Marc MERLIN <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:41:07AM +0100, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Quoting Marc MERLIN ([email protected]):
> 
> > I've implemented greylisting support in sa-exim mostly via a patch to
> > SpamAssassin.  This implementation is actually better than regular
> > greylisting as it only happens for messages that SA scores in the
> > middle (i.e. not certain it's ham or spam)
> 
> I'm thinking of implementing this on my mailservers, but I have my
> doubts about what will happen to mail that comes in via my secmxes.
> 
> 99% of the spam I receive is directed to my fallback mx'es.
> wont this badly affect the greylisting results?
 
Yes.
 
Even sa-exim in itself is not nearly as effective if you're not running it
on all your MXes.
That's even more true for greylisting

I need to submit my new code though, I've added support for reading the SA
flag from within SA, and increasing the tempreject score within sa-exim just
for that mail (instead of lowering the SA score because the sender is
whitelisted)

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/   |   Finger [email protected] for PGP key
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.