Fwd: Re: [exiscanusers] spamassassin rbl tests
Nigel Metheringham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Organization | InTechnology plc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd expect this to be an issue with SA-Exim and exim 4.31 as well... Nigel. -----Forwarded Message----- From: Tom Kistner <[email protected]> To: Erik Grinaker <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [exiscanusers] spamassassin rbl tests Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 11:25:33 +0200 Erik Grinaker wrote: > Could the reason be that the message has not yet gotten a Received: > header from exim in the data ACL? I couldn't find info on this anywhere > in the docs. If so, is there any solution for this problem? I just tested this, and yes, you are right. This does affect the scoring tremendously. This is not really easy to fix, at least not without side effects. I'm working on a workaround right now (sending a dummy Received: header with the relevant data to SA, without adding it to the message). /tom -- [ Nigel Metheringham [email protected] ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]