RE: Looking for feedback on SA-Exim funtionality
"Dickenson, Steven" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jerry Rasmussen wrote: > I am trying to put together a case to use SA-Exim in my current work > place. One of the business requirements is "Create policies to > process mail based on individual and groups of sender/receiver " > Does anyone know if there is a way to accomplish this with SA-Exim. > I have used Spamassassin on my home network for some time but have > not tried to use it in this way. If someone can offer any help or > insight it would be greatly appreciated. If individual user preferences are a requirement, SA-Exim and the like are not for you. SA-Exim operates at SMTP time, where a message can contain multiple recipient. This makes per-user options almost impossible to implement, although people have tried. In my mind, there's only two proper ways to deal with spam: reject it during the SMTP session with a 5xx error, or accept the message and sort it into a spam folder. Generating an NDR after the SMTP session is simply contributes to the spam problem, as you're now creating spam in the case of forged e-mail addresses. Silently trashing mail is a violation of good mail principles, since your delivery system is now unreliable. It all comes down to what's right for your environment. I've found that for most businesses, a site-wide setup rejecting high-scoring spam messages works quite well. For individual environments like a home server with multiple users or an ISP, individual user preferences and bayes databases are a must. In the later case, you don't want to be responsible for the daily upkeep of such a setup, as it's time consuming and a possible invasion of privacy. Use a web-based system like Maia Mailguard to put quarantining and filtering into the hands of the end-users. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[email protected]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland