Re: problem for SpamAssassin 3.0

Quoting Marc MERLIN ([email protected]):

> It works, you just need sa-exim cvs :)

But... I run 4.1-1, which is in Debian, and It Works For Me(TM).

| X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-dot8 (2004-09-13) on sorrow
| X-Spam-Level:
| X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HTML_80_90,
|         HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.0.0-dot8
| X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
| X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [email protected]
| X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dot.freshdot.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false

And/or, this recent log-entry showing sa-exim 4.1 / SA 3.0 rejecting a
message:

| 2004-10-02 06:30:06 1CDbX1-0001L9-LP SA: Action: permanently rejected
| message: score=14.9 required=4.0 trigger=8.0 (scanned in 3/3 secs |
| Message-Id: [email protected]).  From
| <[email protected]> (host=master.debian.org
| [146.82.138.7]) for [email protected]

So, i'm not sure what to think of this. My setup works fine after a few
modifications to /etc/default/spamassassin.

In contrary to what the documentation suggest (spamd -d -u nobody) I am
now running spamd as spamd -m 10 -d. This was because the package I
installed wouldn't run with -u nobody, because the daemon couldn't write
it's pidfile to /var/run (Debian packaging bug, if you ask me).

Anyways. Why is it working for me, and not for him(/you) ?

Regards,
Sander.
-- 
| They're called wisdom teeth, because the experience makes you wise.
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8  9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D