Re: devnull relayed spam?
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi, > > if i want to drop spam that's coming from a known relay (i.e. my email > [email protected] has a static forwarding to [email protected] and > i can't influence what domain1.org MX does, but i own domain2.org), what > would be the best place for this? > > Obviously something like "SAdevnullcond" isn't mentioned in the > sa-exim.conf templates, so i doubt i can just use it like the > SAteergrubecond, can i? If it existed, that'd just leave me the option > to put the default SAdevnull score to some value that isn't very likely > to be matched, but i still can use it to silently drop all spam instead > proactively introducing secondary spam with all my rejects to that relay > MX. I think I understand what you're trying to do, and basically, right now you can only influence whether teergrube will run or not. For that matter, you can't make tne devnull condition run before teergrube either. But let me ask, teergrubbing a peer MX is bad, but why are you trying to /dev/null? Can't you just reject the mail? Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [email protected] for PGP key _______________________________________________ SA-Exim mailing list [email protected] http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 307 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQYmtun4xUKZ2O+kBAQFaygP/azreE5DQNYvu0Vws3TnfmOamFRUtGSNR uZ6TDrGXtMLzwU9Ncz5iHMST+IuKXe++gesYDYpJA9HKgc0vH9HTiPVXOtYO1W23 mpF/1WGYqIpTm7+1NlpITmDPk4E9oAfrky1x08aRaLJRUJVpJBUI6I3zNjn0jf6X VKnkcQofS6A= =YqNm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----