Re: devnull relayed spam?
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:59:46PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> > But let me ask, teergrubbing a peer MX is bad, but why are you trying to
> > /dev/null? Can't you just reject the mail?
>
> sure it's bad. And bouncing would mean to introduce secondary spam as
> most of the sender addresses are very likely to be either fake or void.
> Thus i'd just like to accept them and stuff them into the digital
> dustbin for the sake of other postmasters out there.
I see. I have just less compassion that you :)
(if they accept random spam they're going to get the unbounceable mail
anyway, with or without me refusing some of their forwards)
So, if each option were conditional instead of just having a score, that
would do what you need.
This is already a feature request, and I'm hoping to put that in the next
version
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [email protected] for PGP key
_______________________________________________
SA-Exim mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 307 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBQYpRkn4xUKZ2O+kBAQEIuAP+PC5h90a6IrSuMLcSDAkC4IaCY1UVC4rh WsPFKnFkdIG0CEGPj5JbmHox58fh+eoS/ih01YV+9eXl8Bvz4RhMs5DQH9Q6jkxR SuD5+U0gzU/x1YcQfvRZCbspIRhxGEax9hZcV5oFHXvF1oe48FOn6GoCLBpugjIe +HAkjgo3UC0= =Tk/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----