Re: BCP for calling per-user SA after sa-exim
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 02:03:16PM -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First off, sorry for the cross-post. I'm not sure if this is better
> answered by the SA guys or the SA-exim guys so it's going to both.
>
> I like the idea of using SA-exim because it's got some great features!
> I would also like to incorporate per-user SA for mail that makes it
> past SA-exim. The question is what, if any, is the best common
> practice for doing this, or something like this.
>
> The issues that I have found so far are that there doesn't seem to be a
> way to tell SA-exim to not tag messages below a certain spam-score so
Correct.
> exim can pass it off to an SA transport via an SA router. Can I delete
> the headers or something using an exim ACL?
Sure. system_filter should let you do that, or header_delete in your
transport(s)
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [email protected] for PGP key