RE: Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks
"Mark Boyd" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I believe the web site shows some stats. If remember correctly for small e-mails it's a 5x improvement to use spamd/spamc but for larger ones only a 2x improvement. Check out the web site there's more information there: http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html - Mark -----Original Message----- From: Max Clark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [SA-exim] Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks Hi all! Does anyone know of any benchmarks between the command line perl and the spamc/d implementations of spamassassin? Do I lose any major features using spamc/d? Thanks in advance, Max _______________________________________________ SA-Exim mailing list [email protected] http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim