Re: Greylisting problem
Andrew Hutchings <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:43:01 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Organization | A-Wing Internet Services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:56:39PM +0000, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just setup sa-exim on my Ubuntu Dapper based server. >> I have set: >> SApermreject: 12.0 >> SAtempreject: 3.5 >> SAgreylistraisetempreject: 6.0 >> >> And done the necessary to setup greylisting in Spamassassin. However >> tuplets only seem to be getting added when whitelisting. Instead of >> greylisting it is just temp rejecting. >> >> Can you think of anything I might have missed? > > I'm not sure what you mean: are you saying that greylisting is never able to > write tuplets, and therefore mails always get temprejected? > If so, check your permissions on disk, and your exim/spamassassin logs to > see why spamassassin doesn't have perms to write in > /var/spool/sa-exim/tuplets/ > > Marc (Try again :) Hi Marc, Not quite, it is writing tuplets for whitelisted items (mail with a score <3.5), but it isn't greylisting anything, just constantly temp rejecting if >3.5 && <12 with nothing new in the tuplets. It definitely isn't a permissions problem with /var/spool/sa-exim/tuplets/ Regards Andrew - -- Andrew Hutchings (A-Wing) - Linux Jedi A-Wing Internet Services - www.a-wing.co.uk Windows is the path to the darkside...Windows leads to Blue Screen. Blue Screen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering...I sense much Windows in you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFbvwFZ+2Y3WLvbJIRAqHZAJ4kRC5DcbUMN/ieXjdqyuh81uqLyQCfVdeX opXXdUYnqzEjJMbg7Nam4MU= =4q0Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----