Re: Exim 4.100-RC2 released
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026/08/09 12:33 PM, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote: > I do not get this, Mike was using Claude to check for regressions in > 4.100 compared to 4.99. Isn't it normal even recommended best practice > to check for regressions? I decided to not take any machine-generated input due to the stress level induced. Querying only the regression-testing aspect of this thread ignores that. Were there a bountiful supply of maintainers for the project the policy might be different. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## [email protected] ## Exim details at https://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - https://code.exim.org/exim/wiki/wiki