Re: Vexim Digest, Vol 68, Issue 4

In the immortal words of Avleen Vig  on 12/31/10 16:28:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:53:20PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
>> 2010.12.30 22:31, Terry Danter ra????:
>>> All I can say is it is great news and if it no longer needs php for
>>> the front end then that is one less hassle set up wise to worry about
>>
>> I guess it depends. Myself, I'd prefer PHP to anything else for
>> exactly the same reason ??? it's already set up and works well on
>> the server.
>
> I completely understand Rimas :-)
> I've tried to make this as easy to manage as possible.
> I'm trying to make this as compatible as possible with Python 2.4, which
> is installed on most linux servers these days. I'll be trying to test
> this on older Linux distros (like Centos 4) if I can - but a lot of
> those are passed their End of Life.
>
> My development is currently happening on Python 2.6 with Django 1.2.
> I'm *slightly* tempted to bundle Django into the tarball, so people
> don't have to do anything more than untar and run a script.
> But we'll see. That may be for 3.1.

Bundling django would be nice, if there was a simple way to configure it 
on servers that doesn't have it installed globally like the ones I have.

I actually spent a couple of hours trying to integrate django using 
mod_python on my servers without any luck, it just doesn't want to play 
nicely with PHP/FastCGI.

Any ideas?

Cheers

Tim


-- 
Tim Aslat <[email protected]>
Spyderweb Consulting
http://www.spyderweb.com.au
Mobile: +61 0401088479