RE: Aging Dependencies?

Any opinion on the patch I added to my exmh-workers email most recently?  I'm inclined *not* to submit that stuff because I think it is less than perfect and whatever performance issue I was worried about may not be important to users.

I could turn the crank on a release, but I would need a helper to actually verify it works.

--
Brent


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hornstein
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 8:22 AM
To: Discussion list for EXMH users
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Aging Dependencies?

>On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:21:31 -0400, Ken Hornstein writes:
>>It looks like the issues are: either mmencode needs a home, or we need to
>>switch exmh to a package that is more recent than the first Clinton
>>administration.
>
>the debian variant of exmh (which i maintain) goes for mimencode
>or recode and falls back to the tcl decoder. the changes are small and 
>trivial (see attached patch).

Yup, I see those changes are in the CVS tree.  All we need now is a
release that contains them :-)

--Ken

_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers