Re: Aging Dependencies?

>Any opinion on the patch I added to my exmh-workers email most recently?
>I'm inclined *not* to submit that stuff because I think it is less than
>perfect and whatever performance issue I was worried about may not be
>important to users.

It's been a while since I did any Tcl/Tk work and exmh was always a
big pile of code to digest, so I'm not sure I'm qualified to give it a
thorough review.  But my gut is saying that it should be held off; I
made the mistake of trying to sneak in a feature into the last nmh
release and it turned out that a patch from someone which "had worked
great for us for years" broke some pretty important stuff.  I see you've
already started a release candidate for exmh 2.8.0; awesome!  Hopefully
I'll be able to crank out a release candidate for nmh tomorrow.

--Ken