Re: Aging Dependencies?

On Sun, 06 May 2012 15:10:48 GMT, "Welch, Brent" writes:
>The mangle patch changes a . to a [^\n] in regexp, which seems pretty good.  I 
>gather you don't want to gobble up the whole message when we're matching "BEGIN
> PGP MESSAGE" and that line is messed up.

indeed, looks good and i'll be committing it RSN.
>
>The other patch drops a ";" from the mail headers, and I'm not sure that's ok ?

that patch only applies to application/pgp (i.e. the non-mime, non-multipart, 
ancient pgp format) which hopefully nobody uses anymore on this side of y2k...

as far as i can tell that patch should NOT go in: the mods damage the
already non-standard x-action/x-recipients headers beyond mime compliance
(that ; is required), and the old cruft should contine using mime type
 application/pgp  instead of the application/x-pgp from the patch.

regards
az


-- 
Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/
Fachbegriffe der Informatik, Hot plugable: 
 Glüht beim Einstecken auf -- Martin Neumann

_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk+n0zEACgkQ+bKELRvb2DzH5wD/aj80xL0jxsU6wBXgmmJ7MklC
CemqcDqZPHtXHGRlTQEA/A5WT5k9X2mHU8H9PCoTBdnAdG25jo9zD5rBl+mAYwVM
=KQRE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----