RE: Aging Dependencies?

Thanks - I agree.

--
Brent


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Zangerl
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 6:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [exmh-workers] Aging Dependencies?

On Sun, 06 May 2012 15:10:48 GMT, "Welch, Brent" writes:
>The mangle patch changes a . to a [^\n] in regexp, which seems pretty good.  I 
>gather you don't want to gobble up the whole message when we're matching "BEGIN
> PGP MESSAGE" and that line is messed up.

indeed, looks good and i'll be committing it RSN.
>
>The other patch drops a ";" from the mail headers, and I'm not sure that's ok ?

that patch only applies to application/pgp (i.e. the non-mime, non-multipart, 
ancient pgp format) which hopefully nobody uses anymore on this side of y2k...

as far as i can tell that patch should NOT go in: the mods damage the
already non-standard x-action/x-recipients headers beyond mime compliance
(that ; is required), and the old cruft should contine using mime type
 application/pgp  instead of the application/x-pgp from the patch.

regards
az


-- 
Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/
Fachbegriffe der Informatik, Hot plugable: 
 Glüht beim Einstecken auf -- Martin Neumann