Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add separate "Append to file" button
"Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:15:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Chris, > > In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > > > Were exmh my program I would reject this change on the grounds that > > it is about a decade too late to make it safely. Since exmh is not my > > program, all I can do is advocate for things that I think will make the > > change do as little damage as possible for existing users. > > I understand your position; I'm not going to fight about this. I have > no problems maintaining this out of tree. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk It would be nice in the tree as it adds functionality. I first commented just so we'd be careful how we did it, not to stop it :-) Append being in same position (first of 2 in list) sounds sensible. The new & more dangerous create/truncate should be adjacent, 2nd. Just a question of best names for old & new functions, Before we had: "Save to file" Now maybe: "Append to file" "Overwrite file" With clear names like that we wouldn't need "Are you sure" (Except in case of "Aargh! My mouse skidded down too far ;-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/