RE: current [exmh] source code?

Of course - 2.8.1 would be based off the CVS tree.

--
Brent


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin Cosgrove
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: current [exmh] source code?


On 12 June 2012 at 16:38, "Welch, Brent" <[email protected]> wrote:

> By the way, I've had a busy travel schedule.  I plan to
> checkpoint CVS into a 2.8.1 release and do another tarball
> release, but it might be a couple weeks out still.

Seems fine.  Nice to see any movement. :-)

> As noted, the master CVS is in sourceforge, and I'm open to
> migration to git, but folks will need to help drive that.

I'd rather see the change to git be it's own release, either
2.8.2 or 2.9.  It just seems that it's a major change to the
build & distribution process, maybe not something to roll into an
otherwise nearly done deal.

I like git quite well, and would welcome the change, just not in
2.8.1.

Thanks....
--
Kevin


_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers