Re: Fwd: [Nmh-workers] nmh's future versus mailutils-mh?
Chris Garrigues <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Hal DeVore <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:51:19 -0500 > > I don't follow the GNU project to speak of so I can't comment on > whether the GNU mail utilities are vaporware. But they look > interesting. > > Anybody poked at them? I was going to ask almost exactly the same question. It would be great if someone who's an active exmh user could look into what gaps mailutils-mh has to keep it from supporting exmh. I don't have the resources to look into it unfortunately. It sounds like the mh-e folks have had a good interaction with the mailutils-mh folks. I know many of us would love to be able to run exmh on top of imap and this looks like just the way to get there! Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 If you don't apply what you've learned, you haven't learned anything.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 235 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE/lv1DK9b4h5R0IUIRAtrmAKCEAIaSknW8IatsgSnS2YlrmLTlXACfbd7q JxF6GuTGSx6GLzWqxunwtnE= =9iAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----