Re: exmh-2.7.0 working OK for you?
Brent Welch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The FixupEncoding procedure uses mimencode to generate the quoted printable encoding. That is a small subset of the metamail functionality that we could replace with a Tcl implementation to wean ourselves from metamail. This use of minencode is very old, and not new to 2.7 So, as a near term work-around you can eliminate all of metamail from your systems, except the mimencode binary. I don't know that there are cert advisories for that application, are there? >>>[email protected] said: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > My Sedit users have lately struck a problem with 2.7.0. We decided recently > to disable metamail on our system due to the security vulnerability of > February: > > http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5UP0C2KC0W.html > > We don't use metamail for message handling, so all was well until upgrading > to 2.7. However, now it appears that metamail is being used (for the first > time?) for Sedit "fixup encoding". Although I could turn this type of > function off completely, it probably means that hard returns will need to > be inserted by the user during edit (and, ugh, reformatting). I've also > tried to convert the unenlightened to vi/fmt but I'm sure you'll understand > the reaction to that! > > Considering the response by Debian (Debian Security Advisory DSA 449-1) > to metamail was this: > > "We have been devoting some effort to trying to avoid shipping > metamail in the future. It became unmaintainable and these are > probably not the last of the vulnerabilities." > > what prompted its integration into a fundamental part of message > composition - and can we back it out again? I'm not worried so much about > being exploited during message editing, but reenabling metamail means > trusting everyone to never, accidentally or otherwise, using the metamail > menu items within incoming messages. I'm extremely loath to treat the > reenabling of metamail as anything more than a stop-gap measure and am > thinking about how I can remove the right-click items if there is no other > solution. > > cheers all, > - -- Joel Hatton -- > Security Analyst | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 > AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 > The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au > Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [email protected] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: Exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 > > iEYEARECAAYFAkEEVWoACgkQzecFBzFsCPZ93wCglid0f84Wow8vtp0yQoZmIDhs > PIIAoI8Vntu2rc2DH1XRq8bRbenTsxWE > =/Qpe > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Exmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers > -- Brent Welch Software Architect, Panasas Inc Delivering the premier storage system for scalable Linux clusters www.panasas.com [email protected]