Re: gpg "options" file now deprecated

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exmh.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:19:10 CDT, Neil W Rickert said:

> I'm not sure what's the best solution.  Support for "options" is
> needed for backward compatibility.  Some people might be using older
> gnupg versions.

It wouldn't be *too* hard to grep through the output of a
'gpg --version', but even if you tell it "1.2.4 prefers options,
1.2.5 wants gpg.conf", you *still* lose if they're using 1.2.5 but
haven't renamed the file (and in fact, lose bigger than currently).

I'm tempted to not do anything with the code until such time as
the GnuPG people ship a release that refuses to deal at all with
the file being called "options".....

_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFBCQvccC3lWbTT17ARAlGDAKDSFKhA9HpYlGrwDjIZeDn78mvE3QCdFcIO
zhPR/Ua78c1zdM+nNYMwBYU=
=H17j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.