Re: Seperate Msg Window

> From:  Chris Garrigues <[email protected]>
> Date:  Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:09:12 -0600
>
> I think the bindings may have to be completely refactored to fix this and 
> that's a part of tk that I haven't wrapped my head around yet.  I'll think 
> about this a little more, but I suspect I'll turn off the separate message 
> window rather than try to fix it.

Let me change that to "the bindings SHOULD be completely refactored".  I fixed 
the bug by adding Command to the bindings for the ftoc in complete violation 
of modularity.  It turns out to be exactly the right thing to do, but the code 
is such a mess that it was hard to tell.

I started to refactor the code, but once I figured out the kludgey solution was 
a one-liner, I changed my mind since I do have more important things to work 
on.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                         Trinsic Solutions
President                               1611-B West 6th Street
                                        Austin, TX  78703-5074

512-322-0180                            http://www.trinsics.com

                 Would you rather proactively pay for
                uptime or reactively pay for downtime?

                          Trinsic Solutions
                 Your Proactive IT Management Partner

_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000

iD8DBQFB7ulOK9b4h5R0IUIRAgB0AJ9iifEqQCG2OYptgBg1ttOYSFJELwCdF/qD
4YP53EB9c2b6mYO4Amtll+A=
=RJtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----