ftoc bug report
Alexander Zangerl <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Feb 2005 22:36:50 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
another one from the debianites:
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/293560>
the submitter gets a syntax error on opening the first pgp-signed
message:
--------------
syntax error in expression "int(1+1+(11-)*(101-1-2)/(101-))"
while executing
"expr int($minlineno+1+($msgid-$minmsgid)*($maxlineno-$minlineno-2)/($maxmsgid-$minmsgid))"
(procedure "Ftoc_FindMsg" line 51)
invoked from within
"Ftoc_FindMsg $msg"
(procedure "Ftoc_FindMsgs" line 5)
invoked from within
"Ftoc_FindMsgs $seqids"
(procedure "Ftoc_ShowSequence" line 21)
invoked from within
"Ftoc_ShowSequence $seq $msgids"
(procedure "Ftoc_ShowSequences" line 16)
invoked from within
"Ftoc_ShowSequences"
(procedure "FolderChange" line 54)
invoked from within
"FolderChange privat/az {Msg_Show cur}"
invoked from within
"time [list FolderChange $folder $msgShowProc"
(procedure "Folder_Change" line 3)
invoked from within
"Folder_Change privat/az"
(command bound to event)
------------------
looking at the code in question, it seems to me that $minmsgid
might only be blank if the cache is severly borked.
two questions for the ones who know the innards of exmh better:
*) would a update-scan-caches operation fix this issue?
*) or is my assumption re the cause of the problem wrong and something
else is broken?
i'm grateful for any infos...
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
This mind intentionally left blank.
_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCCLJ4py/2bEK9ZF0RAuLOAKCS59hWuv9Kwe6ZmMq5rlDxOtPOTQCfWpkG 0hJ4W5rcyQXo14oy9hJO3E0= =DQJb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----