Re: "-nocc me"

Kevin Cosgrove <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exmh.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 17 October 2007 at 12:47, Douglas Kline <[email protected]> wrote:

> > 
> > On 17 October 2007 at 12:33, Douglas Kline <[email protected]> wrote
> :
> > 
> > > How do I get my address out of reply-all operations?
> > 
> > I do this in my ~/.mh_profile with this line
> > 
> > repl: -annotate -editor vim -fcc outbox -filter .components/mhl.repl -form .c
> omponents/replcomps -inplace -nocc me
> > 
> > The "-nocc me" is the part you're interested in.
> 
> 
> Thanks.  Unfortunately I already have that in my ~/.mh_profile.  So it must be
> something else that is taking precedence over the "-nocc me".

There were recently some changes to the email system where I work 
that broke the usefulness of "-nocc me" by causing the machine that I 
use to send email to have a different idea of "me" than does the 
email server.  I wonder if you're running into something like that.
I'm not sure of all the mail server specifics, but there is a lot of 
address rewriting going on, and there's a procmail server in the mix 
which reports a different idea of "me" again.

Good luck....

 
--
Kevin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.