Re: "-nocc me"
Kevin Cosgrove <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 October 2007 at 12:47, Douglas Kline <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 17 October 2007 at 12:33, Douglas Kline <[email protected]> wrote > : > > > > > How do I get my address out of reply-all operations? > > > > I do this in my ~/.mh_profile with this line > > > > repl: -annotate -editor vim -fcc outbox -filter .components/mhl.repl -form .c > omponents/replcomps -inplace -nocc me > > > > The "-nocc me" is the part you're interested in. > > > Thanks. Unfortunately I already have that in my ~/.mh_profile. So it must be > something else that is taking precedence over the "-nocc me". There were recently some changes to the email system where I work that broke the usefulness of "-nocc me" by causing the machine that I use to send email to have a different idea of "me" than does the email server. I wonder if you're running into something like that. I'm not sure of all the mail server specifics, but there is a lot of address rewriting going on, and there's a procmail server in the mix which reports a different idea of "me" again. Good luck.... -- Kevin