Re: Partitioning lines in FTOC ?
"Robert Wirth" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:55:43 +0200, Robert Wirth said: > > > is there a chance to change the splitting of the lines in the FTOC? > > Actually, only the first 24 characters of the messages' subject lines > > are displayed. I'd like to see more of the subjects (and less of the > > messages' body preview) > > This is set by whatever format you have for the 'scan' command. > I have in .mh_profile: > > scan: -form scan/timely > > and then down in Mail/scan/timely: > > %5(msg)%<(cur)+%| %>\ > %<{x-priority}%01{x-priority}%| %> \ > %<{Replied}R%|%<(unseen)U%| %>%>%<{In-reply-to}*%| %>\ > %(void{content-type})\ > %<(match text/plain) \ > %?(match multipart/signed)S\ > %?(match multipart/encrypted)E\ > %|%<{content-type}M%|?%>%> \ > %(void(rclock{date}))\ > %<(gt 31356000)%02(mday{date}) %03(month{date}) %(void(year{date}))%02(modulo 10 > 0)%|\ > %<(gt 86400)%(day{date}) %2(mday{date})%03(month{date})%|\ > %02(hour{date}):%02(min{date}) %3(tzone{date})%>%>\ > %<{date} %|*%> %6(size) \ > %<(mymbox{from})To:%14(decode(friendly{to}))%|\ > %(void(addr{from}))\ > %<(match mailer@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match mailer-daemon@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match listserv@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match listbit@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match mailbit@)%17(friendly{to})\ > %?(match postoffice@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match postmaster@)%17(host{from})\ > %?(match root@)%17(host{from})\ > %|%17(decode(friendly{from}))%>%> \ > %(decode{subject})\ > %(void{content-type})\ > %<(match multipart)%|\ > %<{body} <<%{body}%>\ > %> > > (yeah it's ugly, Deal with it., :) > > Most likely, whatever scan format you have says something like: > > %24%(decode{subject}) > > to limit it to 24 characters. Nuking the %24 will remove that width restriction. YEAH! That's it! Tnank you! While I were at it, I added this pretty "decode" function, and, now, the subject lines using special characters are readable! ;-) Thank you again. Robert