Re: replying to an attachment?

Kevin Cosgrove <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exmh.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 31 October 2011 at 13:47, Harvey Eneman <[email protected]> wrote:

> What usually works for me is to right click on the part's message 
> header and select "Extract a message/rfs822 into current folder".
> You should then be able to process the extracted message in the
> usual way.

In command line you might have luck with

   mhn -list <msgno>	to see what parts are contained in the message
   mhn -store -auto	to unpack the message into the current folder

Good luck....

> Regards,
> 
> Harv
> 
> 
> ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
> Content-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Description: original message
> 
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pond.us.oracle.com
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
> 	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
> Received: from pond.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by pond.localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A7CE1C0309
> 	for <heneman@localhost>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from stbeehive.gdns.oraclecorp.com [141.146.118.10]
> 	by pond.us.oracle.com with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.20)
> 	for <heneman@localhost> (single-drop);
> 	Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (/141.146.126.237)
> 	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
> 	with ESMTP ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:32:32 -0700
> Received: from acsinet13.oracle.com (acsinet13.oracle.com [141.146.126.235])
> 	by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
> 	p9VKWVuS022273
> 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
> 	Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:32:31 GMT
> Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (mx3-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.24])
> 	by acsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id
> 	p9VKWN8M032066; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:32:24 GMT
> Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
> 	(lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33])
> 	by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9VKT8um015189;
> 	Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:30:58 -0400
> Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
> 	(int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])
> 	by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
> 	id p9VKT6cn028875 for <[email protected]>;
> 	Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:29:06 -0400
> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
> 	[10.5.110.19])
> 	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
> 	id p9VKT1qL012746
> 	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:29:01 -0400
> Received: from twedge02.ohsu.edu (twedge02.ohsu.edu [137.53.6.166])
> 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9VKT095001245
> 	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:29:01 -0400
> Received: from twapp03.ohsu.edu (unknown [10.76.7.12])
> 	by twedge02.ohsu.edu (Axway MailGate 3.8.1) with ESMTP id 22CD136C090
> 	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
> X-WSS-ID: 0LTY687-0I-1PQ-02
> X-M-MSG: 
> X-TMWD-Spam-Summary: TS=20111031202855; ID=1; SEV=2.4.2; DFV=B2011103120;
> 	IFV=NA; AIF=B2011103120; RPD=NA; ENG=NA; RPDID=NA; CAT=NONE;
> 	CON=NONE; SIG=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAfwAAAQAAfQ==
> Received: from kyklops.ohsu.edu (unknown [10.76.7.14])
> 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
> 	(No client certificate requested)
> 	by twapp03.ohsu.edu (Axway MailGate 3.8.1) with ESMTP id 2CF844480CD3
> 	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from kyklops.ohsu.edu (kyklops.local [127.0.0.1])
> 	by kyklops.ohsu.edu (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9VKSxmO009056
> 	for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: (from hakansom@localhost)
> 	by kyklops.ohsu.edu (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id p9VKSx6A009054;
> 	Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: replying to an attachment?
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:28:59 -0700
> From: Marion Hakanson <[email protected]>
> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -3.501  (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD)
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.110.19
> X-loop: [email protected]
> X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
> Precedence: junk
> Reply-To: Discussion list for EXMH users <[email protected]>
> List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.redhat.com>
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/exmh-users>,
> 	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/private/exmh-users>
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
> 	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: [email protected]
> Errors-To: [email protected]
> X-Flow-Control-Info: class=Default ip=209.132.183.24 ct-class=T1 ct-vol1=0
> 	ct-vol2=5 ct-vol3=5 ct-risk=42 ct-spam1=67 ct-spam2=0 ct-bulk=95
> 	rcpts=2 size=1072
> X-Source-IP: mx3-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.24]
> X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4EAF05D9.0024:SCFSTAT2484459, ss=1, re=-4.000,
> 	fgs=0
> X-jf: 20020519, 1:1,2:1,3:1,4:0,ad:1,bo:1,di:1,do:1,he:1,ip:1,us:0
> X-filter: ifile 1.3.8 => Tools/exmh
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I could use some advice on how to reply to a message which is a MIME
> attachment inside of another message.  In this particular case, the
> original message was sent to an Exchange mailbox, and then (for various
> reasons I won't go into here) forwarded as an attachment to myself.
> 
> Naturally, the return address(es) I want to reply to are actually
> in the attachment, so the normal repl/replcomps mechanisms never
> sees those when replying to the "outer" message.  Modern mail reader
> programs these days have a way to "open" such a nested message and
> then operate on it normally, but I can't see an obvious method in
> exmh as it is.  Maybe someone has some Tcl/Tk code that does this?
> 
> In case it matters, I'm using exmh-2.7.2 and nmh-1.3, on the
> OpenIndiana-151a operating system, x86_64 platform.
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> 
> -- 
> Marion Hakanson <[email protected]>
> OHSU Advanced Computing Center
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
> 
> 
> ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0--
> 
> --==_Exmh_1320094030_525P
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005
> 
> iD8DBQFOrwlOJWLrSYxEfJMRAnySAKCFNBa6kBl+QkLvy+VJy+wp+NJlywCeIBgq
> 469Wav1t4FRplaKI6DaBzY0=
> =vZOY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --==_Exmh_1320094030_525P--
> 
> 
> --===============2693429711594334850==
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
> --===============2693429711594334850==--
> 
 
--
Kevin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.