Re: replying to an attachment?

On 31 October 2011 at 19:51, [email protected] wrote:

> 
>  > > What usually works for me is to right click on the part's message 
>  > > header and select "Extract a message/rfs822 into current folder".
>  > > You should then be able to process the extracted message in the
>  > > usual way.
> 
>  > In command line you might have luck with
>  > 
>  >    mhn -list <msgno>	to see what parts are contained in the message
>  >    mhn -store -auto	to unpack the message into the current folder
>  > 
>  > Good luck....
> 
> If the inner msg you want to repl to is always the Nth part, then maybe
> adding -part N to mhshow invocation in the enclosed script will be a whole
> cli solution?  Or strip -part N from $* and use it in mhshow (at that point
> i'd recode in perl.)
> 
> Fyi/fwiw, I call the script "replx", and I use it a lot these days.  It uses
> mhshow to pretty print the enclosed msg you're replying to--increasing
> necessary with so many html-only and other quoted-printable encoded msgs
> being sent.  See also the exmh archives ca Jun 2004.
> 
> steve
> --
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> repl -filter /dev/null -nodraftfolder -nowhatnowproc $*
> (cat ~/Mail/draft; echo -e "\n > ---- Original Message ----" ; \
>   mhshow cur -type text -nopause -nomoreproc \
>     | egrep -v '^Return-Path|^Delivery-Date|^part[ ]+text/plain' \
>     | egrep -v '^X-|^MIME' \
>     | sed 's/^/ > /' \
>   )  > ~/Mail/drafts/999
> comp -use -draftfolder drafts -draftmessage 999
> rm -f ~/Mail/draft
> rm -f ~/Mail/drafts/999

Maybe 'rmm' instead of 'rm' ???


--
Kevin