Re: Feedback about exmh new version 2.8.0
Alexander Zangerl <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:58:38 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:07:12 +0200, Emile CARCAMO writes: >- to avoid troubles with msgShow.tcl, I had to replace all occurences >of exmh_lassign by lassign like it was the case wirh version 2.7.2 : this makes little sense, as the change *TO* exmh_lassign was made in 2010 precisely to avoid conflicts with tcl8.5's lassign, which has a different argument order and therefore doesn't work. (exmh's exmh_lassign wants (varnames,values), tcl8.5's lassign wants (values,varnames).) regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/ Don't drop dead. Do, please, drop seriously, painfully, disablingly, repulsively, incurably, but _not_ fatally ill. -- Mike Andrews _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 230 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk+UfxoACgkQ+bKELRvb2DzNZQD8CK/Ss1hnZqdbc8PPsFGmz4Cf hFto8x4FoD3SlPKb7H8A/3wzEKF5/l2bz+vooHBZS06ZRg7ZqFa3gaJS37DGBxa1 =iP+f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----