RE: Feedback about exmh new version 2.8.0
"Welch, Brent" <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:20:09 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exmh.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DA636AC7BF798243A4007D3AA0B3D3A746E99DFC@seabiscuit.int.panasas.com> |
Yeah, it would be good to see the exact Tcl stack trace from the troubles you had with msgShow.tcl. I'd like to get to the root cause. Brent -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Zangerl Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:59 PM To: Discussion list for EXMH users Subject: Re: Feedback about exmh new version 2.8.0 On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:07:12 +0200, Emile CARCAMO writes: >- to avoid troubles with msgShow.tcl, I had to replace all occurences >of exmh_lassign by lassign like it was the case wirh version 2.7.2 : this makes little sense, as the change *TO* exmh_lassign was made in 2010 precisely to avoid conflicts with tcl8.5's lassign, which has a different argument order and therefore doesn't work. (exmh's exmh_lassign wants (varnames,values), tcl8.5's lassign wants (values,varnames).) regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/ Don't drop dead. Do, please, drop seriously, painfully, disablingly, repulsively, incurably, but _not_ fatally ill. -- Mike Andrews