RE: Feedback about exmh new version 2.8.0

"Welch, Brent" <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:20:09 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exmh.user
Message-ID <DA636AC7BF798243A4007D3AA0B3D3A746E99DFC@seabiscuit.int.panasas.com>
Yeah, it would be good to see the exact Tcl stack trace from the troubles you had with msgShow.tcl.  I'd like to get to the root cause.
	Brent

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Zangerl
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 2:59 PM
To: Discussion list for EXMH users
Subject: Re: Feedback about exmh new version 2.8.0

On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:07:12 +0200, Emile CARCAMO writes:
>- to avoid troubles with msgShow.tcl, I had to replace all occurences 
>of exmh_lassign by lassign like it was the case wirh version 2.7.2 :

this makes little sense, as the change *TO* exmh_lassign was made in 2010 precisely to avoid conflicts with tcl8.5's lassign, which has a different argument order and therefore doesn't work. 

(exmh's exmh_lassign wants (varnames,values), tcl8.5's lassign wants
(values,varnames).)

regards
az


--
Alexander Zangerl + GnuPG Keys 0x42BD645D or 0x5B586291 + http://snafu.priv.at/ Don't drop dead. Do, please, drop seriously, painfully, disablingly, repulsively, incurably, but _not_ fatally ill. -- Mike Andrews