Re: svn commit: r9916 - trunk/doc/book/book

Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:04:02 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.mail.eyebrowse.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svn
Message-ID <1086228242.1867.52.camel__46964.1294716441$1086271256@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 07:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> >  ?      foo.o               # svn doesn't manage foo.o
> >  !      some_dir            # svn manages this, but it's either missing or incomplete
> >  ~      qux                 # versioned as dir, but is file, or vice versa
> > +I      .screenrc           # this file is ignored
> >  A  +   moved_dir           # added with history of where it came from
> >  M  +   moved_dir/README    # added with history and has local modifications
> >  D      stuff/fish.c        # this file is scheduled for deletion
> 
> 
> This breaks the example.  'svn status' will not show 'I' output unless
> --no-ignores is passed to it.  If you plan to show 'I' output in the
> example, you should have the example use --no-ignores.

Hmmm.  Then my official opinion is that we just toss the "$ svn status"
line.  Stop pretending this is *literal* output... just say it's a list
of the different things the status command *can* print, depending on how
it's invoked.