Re: svn commit: r9916 - trunk/doc/book/book
Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:04:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.eyebrowse.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1086228242.1867.52.camel__46964.1294716441$1086271256@localhost.localdomain> |
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 07:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > ? foo.o # svn doesn't manage foo.o > > ! some_dir # svn manages this, but it's either missing or incomplete > > ~ qux # versioned as dir, but is file, or vice versa > > +I .screenrc # this file is ignored > > A + moved_dir # added with history of where it came from > > M + moved_dir/README # added with history and has local modifications > > D stuff/fish.c # this file is scheduled for deletion > > > This breaks the example. 'svn status' will not show 'I' output unless > --no-ignores is passed to it. If you plan to show 'I' output in the > example, you should have the example use --no-ignores. Hmmm. Then my official opinion is that we just toss the "$ svn status" line. Stop pretending this is *literal* output... just say it's a list of the different things the status command *can* print, depending on how it's invoked.