Re: svn commit: r12136 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_client
"C. Michael Pilato" <[email protected]> 03 Dec 2004 09:41:08 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.eyebrowse.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.svn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <m3u0r38k4r.fsf__16081.7329925068$1102088970$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain> |
Philip Martin <philip-6ttV0fGTPV0sXMjTw6Upulpr/1R2p/[email protected]> writes: > Now I'm worried that r12006 doesn't fix the problem it's supposed to > fix. r12006 makes both the client and server do the right thing when both are running r12006. In the case where the server isn't running the new code (as your mail demonstrates), r12006 plus your idea of ignore the "not versioned" error still makes a huge improvement for most items in the switched try, but yes, can still be fooled by the existence of similarly-named things up a directory level. The simplest compatibility step that solves all the problems is to simply turn off the resource walk in 1.2 and re-enable it some time in the future. Note that ra-dav will still, at the beginning of a switch, invalidate all wcprops in the switched target tree.