Re: "svn diff" and "svn log" timestamp weirdness
Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel,gmane.mail.eyebrowse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7C8F6220C5508F0DC32F7DF9__35720.3180240051$1125527067$gmane$org@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> |
--On August 31, 2005 4:31:32 PM -0400 John Peacock <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't have any problem setting the resolution at something less than a > second; going to 1/100ths or 1/1000ths is probably good. Milliseconds > are reasonable; microseconds gets into the range of context swaps in the > kernel (i.e. noise) and nanoseconds (or god forbid attoseconds) are just > fictional for conventional PC's. I agree Brane and Michael: fix the UI to return it over the implicit period in question. Removing any level of precision in the repository from what APR produces (64-bit microseconds) gets a -1 from me too. (There were lots of heated debates over 'time' in APR. Ugh.) -- justin