Re: Text_Markup , some necessary evolution of Text_Wiki ?
Seth Price <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:26:34 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.pear.devel,gmane.mail.eyebrowse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It sounds like you are agreeing with my emails to the PEAR QA list about my version of HTML_BBCodeParser. Here are links to copies of the relevant emails. Current status of my HTML_BBCodeParser and initial maintainer proposal: http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3388 Changes that could be made with a redesign: http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3397 And I even gave the redesign the name Text_Markup: http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3399 I've thought about the idea some more, and I have a good idea for the design of Text_Markup. We should keep in touch. ~Seth On Jan 23, 2006, at 9:10 AM, bertrand Gugger wrote: > Bonjour, > My first reaction to Text_Wiki was "huh ?" , so much files for so > simple things... > Later, I worked with Justin around some CMS's , then he showed me > up his "home-cooked" extensions for Tiki, Doku and Cowiki. > I got immediately convinced, Paul's package was indeed what wikis > need for user's text rendering. > > Lol, then I put some pressure on Paul, so Justin and I became devs > on Text_Wiki. > That was in fact some continuation of that whole move , Text_Wiki > is from the beginning some community effort, just take a look on > all the people in source contributors, devs, buggers & patchers. > > Since those first released extensions, (Tiki, Doku and Cowiki), and > moreover the various corrections occurred, it gave some more > extensions: > * BBCode parser: the model is not restricted to "wikis" , I felt a > necessity for it. Text_Wiki_BBCode offers some full replacement to > HTML_BBCodeParser whose deprecation is in talk. Some experimental > Text_Wiki_BBCode powered pearweb was successfully tested. > * under popular pressure, Text_Wiki_Mediawiki was born in late 2005. > > Outer the improvements what will naturally give, some next > extensions will occur in the optional renderings: > * pdf was planned and asked since long time > * I examine the possibility to docBook a little > * I have a quick made TiddlyWiki render, case somebody interested... > > Naturally, I'm very happy about how all things turn out, I want to > thank Paul to have put that stuff in here ... and sure also the > numerous contributors. > > Now, I believe that package has to evolve > > * first of all the doc is outside pear, I request it to be inside > (Paul ?) (rendering docBook belongs to it) > * the name "..._Wiki" itself hides the real purpose, transforming > text and markup inside, I like the Text_Markup name which came out > couple of time (I would hate Text_Wiki2) > * we miss some global coherence tests as , say (html) <i><u> ... </ > i></u> and more ... I would point out Text_Markup mission cannot be > to correct but refuse, eventually > * the file structure of the package leads to too many files (as we > accord to the 1 class/ 1 file rule) but as such we slightly don't > respect the CS for naming classes and anyway: > [bertrand@ancilla Text_Wiki]$ find . -name '*.php' -print | wc -l > 481 > the next extensions will explode that to more than 500 classes. > - we lack some practical examples > > Sorry for such a long mail, be happy, I forgot a lot. > > Please, feel free to report any comment/request as it's preparing > Text_(Wiki|Markup)? future. > > Pearly yours, > -- > toggg > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php