Re: Text_Markup , some necessary evolution of Text_Wiki ?

Seth Price <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:26:34 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.pear.devel,gmane.mail.eyebrowse.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It sounds like you are agreeing with my emails to the PEAR QA list  
about my version of HTML_BBCodeParser. Here are links to copies of  
the relevant emails.

Current status of my HTML_BBCodeParser and initial maintainer proposal:
http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3388

Changes that could be made with a redesign:
http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3397

And I even gave the redesign the name Text_Markup:
http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3399

I've thought about the idea some more, and I have a good idea for the  
design of Text_Markup. We should keep in touch.
~Seth

On Jan 23, 2006, at 9:10 AM, bertrand Gugger wrote:

> Bonjour,
> My first reaction to Text_Wiki was "huh ?" , so much files for so  
> simple things...
> Later, I worked with Justin around some CMS's , then he showed me  
> up his "home-cooked" extensions for Tiki, Doku and Cowiki.
> I got immediately convinced, Paul's package was indeed what wikis  
> need for user's text rendering.
>
> Lol, then I put some pressure on Paul, so Justin and I became devs  
> on Text_Wiki.
> That was in fact some continuation of that whole move , Text_Wiki  
> is from the beginning some community effort, just take a look on  
> all the people in source contributors, devs, buggers & patchers.
>
> Since those first released extensions, (Tiki, Doku and Cowiki), and  
> moreover the various corrections occurred, it gave some more  
> extensions:
> * BBCode parser: the model is not restricted to "wikis" , I felt a  
> necessity for it. Text_Wiki_BBCode offers some full replacement to  
> HTML_BBCodeParser whose deprecation is in talk. Some experimental  
> Text_Wiki_BBCode powered pearweb was successfully tested.
> * under popular pressure, Text_Wiki_Mediawiki was born in late 2005.
>
> Outer the improvements what will naturally give, some next  
> extensions will occur in the optional renderings:
> * pdf was planned and asked since long time
> * I examine the possibility to docBook a little
> * I have a quick made TiddlyWiki render, case somebody interested...
>
> Naturally, I'm very happy about how all things turn out, I want to  
> thank Paul to have put that stuff in here ... and sure also the  
> numerous contributors.
>
> Now, I believe that package has to evolve
>
> * first of all the doc is outside pear, I request it to be inside  
> (Paul ?) (rendering docBook belongs to it)
> * the name "..._Wiki" itself hides the real purpose, transforming  
> text and markup inside, I like the Text_Markup name which came out  
> couple of time (I would hate Text_Wiki2)
> * we miss some global coherence tests as , say (html) <i><u> ... </ 
> i></u> and more ... I would point out Text_Markup mission cannot be  
> to correct but refuse, eventually
> * the file structure of the package leads to too many files (as we  
> accord to the 1 class/ 1 file rule) but as such we slightly don't  
> respect the CS for naming classes and anyway:
> [bertrand@ancilla Text_Wiki]$ find . -name '*.php' -print | wc -l
> 481
> the next extensions will explode that to more than 500 classes.
> - we lack some practical examples
>
> Sorry for such a long mail, be happy, I forgot a lot.
>
> Please, feel free to report any comment/request as it's preparing  
> Text_(Wiki|Markup)? future.
>
> Pearly yours,
> -- 
> toggg
>
> -- 
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php