Re: Haeaderadd and the message archive
Christian Lerrahn <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:41:11 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ezmlm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20070719234111.0d0a911d@localhost> |
Bruce, > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:33:28AM -0700, David I. Bell wrote: > > Is there a reason why the headers from headeradd should not (must > > not?) be inserted into the message before the message is put in the > > archive? > > I don't recall ever hearing a reason one way or another. I too have > observed that behavior, and it has been that way for as long as I can > remember. Most likely it was considered desireable to maintaine a > pristine copy of the distributed email (including Received: headers > that are normally stripped from outgoing emails) for a variety of > purposes. This is what I guessed about the Received: headers, too. This is definitely not information you want to lose. However, if you anonymise a list and strip From: it gets stripped from the archived message, too. IMHO, it here doesn't make sense that it is still indexed with a sender on it. Cheers, Christian