Re: ezmlm-issubn: non-existent directories

Lars Kruse <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:37:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ezmlm
Message-ID <20080206103712.31eebf49@erker>
Hi David,

thanks for your reply!


> > The behaviour of v0.435 is what I would expect, since it should be
> > sufficient, that the SENDER address is in any of the given
> > (list-)directories.
> >
> > how can I fix this difference here?
> 
> I believe the change is a documented one.  The problem you are
> experiencing is because of the way you have written the command line.

I was (partly) aware of that change, but I did not really see it as a problem,
since I just assumed backward-compatibility.


> Try this instead...
> 
> $ ezmlm-issubn '/data/lists/foo' . digest; echo $?

ok - now I get it completely - thanks!


I also read the ezmlm-issubn manapge before, but its content made me think, that
the old behaviour still works:

<quote>
If dir1 (or more) are present on the command line and are relative  paths,
ezmlm- issubn  only  examines the named subdirectories within the preceding
absolute path dir.
</quote>

I expected the old behaviour, since "subdir1 (or more)" are not relative paths
in my example.


And I also skipped the UPGRADES.idx section, since I remembered the following:

<quote>
The changes have been made so that most uses of these tools will still work as
before, but some usages may break, particularly on new lists or lists that have
been edited after upgrading.
</quote>

I did not see myself falling into these categories.

So I am still not sure: is ezmlm-issubn supposed to be backward compatible
(regarding absolute paths)?


thanks!
Lars