Re: Next steps for ezmlm-idx
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:37:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ezmlm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--HuXIgs6JvY9hJs5C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:41:55PM -0400, Matt Simpson wrote: > One option I would like as a manager is the ability to define a list of= =20 > users whose messages should be moderated, while messages from other users= =20 > would be posted immediately. If I understand ezmlm-gate correctly, this= =20 > function would simply be the reverse of the way it operates now. IOW you trust posters to your list but want to constrain troublemakers. It seems straightforward enough, but obviously the same "allow" etc directories can't be used. > I would prefer for error messages from ezmlm to be sent as new messages= =20 > with customizable content instead of bounce messages from MAILER-DAEMON i= n=20 > qmail's bounce format. This makes some sense. The amount of system work required for ezmlm to generate a bounce would be comparable to what qmail already does to bounce a message, so there's no big loss there. If you don't mind a generic error message, it wouldn't even be hard to graft such a process into the standard error exit path. Is it worth the effort though? Is this a problem for others? --=20 Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> http://untroubled.org/ --HuXIgs6JvY9hJs5C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIytLx6W+y3GmZgOgRAiZlAJ9elN4U9FhWnsaIFJRicot+RTtHXwCfd1cH jcYh7dAdpqnXnyWp5mOJ/HE= =g+RD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HuXIgs6JvY9hJs5C--