Re: message rejected
Asif Iqbal <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:48:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ezmlm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Asif Iqbal<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Asif Iqbal<[email protected]> wrote: >> I send an email to [email protected] and it gets redirected to >> [email protected] but gets rejected. >> >> # cat ~alias/.qmail-help >> &[email protected] >> |/opt/rt3/bin/rt-mailgate --queue help --action correspond --url >> https://ticket.example.net >> >> $ cat /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal >> 2009-07-01 15:13:11.489522500 new msg 403625 >> 2009-07-01 15:13:11.489694500 info msg 403625: bytes 1637 from >> <[email protected]> qp 19468 uid 7790 >> 2009-07-01 15:13:11.615582500 starting delivery 3353789: msg 403625 to >> local [email protected] >> 2009-07-01 15:13:11.615687500 status: local 1/50 remote 0/300 >> 2009-07-01 15:13:11.673855500 delivery 3353789: failure: >> ezmlm-reject:_fatal:_List_address_must_be_in_To:_or_C >> c:_(#5.7.0)/ >> 2009-07-01 15:13:12.081831500 status: local 0/50 remote 0/300 >> 2009-07-01 15:13:12.133171500 bounce msg 403625 qp 19474 >> 2009-07-01 15:13:12.133504500 end msg 403625 >> >> >> How do I manage to send the emails to [email protected] short of >> converting it to group alias ? I see that if I convert it to group alias it works fine. Is there a workaround where I can still keep the [email protected] as a mailing list without the ezmlm reject? > > > btw, I am using ezmlm version 0.435 > > $ ezmlm-manage -v > ezmlm-manage version: ezmlm-idx-0.435 > > >> >> >> -- >> Asif Iqbal >> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> > > > > -- > Asif Iqbal > PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?