Re: Fetchmail without passwords in plaintext file?

Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.fetchmail.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 12.12.18 um 14:07 schrieb Bjoern Voigt:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>> While I realize there is a need for encrypted passwd's in the more densly
>> populated and/or industrial areas where business critical information 
>> might be sought by the shadier types, that need has not reached out here 
>> in the puckerbrush. Yet... I am not aware of any pop3 server in this 
>> moderately rural area, ever asking us to use encrypted passwds. Not 
>> saying there aren't such isp's but I've not encountered any yet.  What 
>> I'm saying is that forcing it on us, would force us to find another 
>> fetchmail like agent. In fact, they've not even forced us to longer 
>> passwds yet. I'd druther they did, to at least 20 alpha/numeric chars 
>> but too many winders users think 12345 or 54321Boom is good enough.
>> And they are the majority by far. I'm an island of all linux stuff here.
> Gene, I do not think, that Fetchmail will force us to store passwords
> encrypted. But I think, Fetchmail should ofter at least one working
> interface to an encrypted password store or password manager. And I
> think, the Fetchmail documentation should recommend to store passwords
> encrypted.


Björn,

you may want to get fetchmail's master branch from Git or possibly the
7.0.0-alpha6 tarball (*) and let us know what you think of either
passwordeval and/or PWMD support.

(*) currently at <http://krusty.dt.e-technik.tu-dortmund.de/~ma/fetchmail/>

HTH

Matthias



_______________________________________________
Fetchmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fetchmail-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.