Re: getmail & JMAP

Saša Janiška <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.getmail.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:05:14 -0600
Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's interesting.  If it becomes widely deployed that would probably
> be a good thing; 

OK.

> I make no secret of my loathing for IMAP, which is a
> truly awful protocol.

:-)

> Not at all at the moment.  If in the future there are email service
> providers who only provide JMAP access, then perhaps getmail could be
> extended to support it 

OK.

> however, JMAP looks designed primarily for
> MUAs to use to modify the state of the user's mailbox on the server.

Yeah, that's something which I do not like.

> It's somewhat less relevant in the case of getmail, which just
> retrieves mail for a local process to deal with.

You're right. Thank you for your response.


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
There is no possibility of one's becoming a yogī, O Arjuna,
if one eats too much or eats too little, sleeps too much
or does not sleep enough.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=iQZv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.