Re: getmail & JMAP
Saša Janiška <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.getmail.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:05:14 -0600 Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> wrote: > It's interesting. If it becomes widely deployed that would probably > be a good thing; OK. > I make no secret of my loathing for IMAP, which is a > truly awful protocol. :-) > Not at all at the moment. If in the future there are email service > providers who only provide JMAP access, then perhaps getmail could be > extended to support it OK. > however, JMAP looks designed primarily for > MUAs to use to modify the state of the user's mailbox on the server. Yeah, that's something which I do not like. > It's somewhat less relevant in the case of getmail, which just > retrieves mail for a local process to deal with. You're right. Thank you for your response. Sincerely, Gour -- There is no possibility of one's becoming a yogī, O Arjuna, if one eats too much or eats too little, sleeps too much or does not sleep enough.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEWDpE0TZF+khoOctpNyVpzrf8dgUFAlu6LUcACgkQNyVpzrf8 dgUMOhAAlA9u7dQTHONR7jn5wfOaqJk2EmrJzhGO3uoKUjpO6W/ATf9CSkfru0YI kpvMeE2RoBL4maOsDFl93wln5Ne7o0jnCkisoijp2RkDW5IPlzJ+u6xGOSSwgDxb KYA6PKOQoQcFVoFslKas3GD6F56ImSnVTYgdy30fzoHd49ymKupoYxjrSI1NqnDW 8WHk0ZDCl2KwcSakkQ6baJWpThxYYSDMTQzUiqchpgIaKkc1zUobRPwuSE32/caR NLxA0hUqkTKC6qcRiWuW5NPV+/DU6w7Om1WuQ2/L3Xgv7vLAHS9uPVCXT6CoXfZ4 oQ2dBm4tRPW104usSidHK137oU0CmdJ3nxdofQE6RsJBDBT/0BgFs6s7Bl4+O2Rw C9rhZpqqSSiM8xpEZRnrVOgc9651GCRS2N27UCsZAZVtKrqEKgaOesjmz9nKmZMJ ZjfOAiceuTWrvbVNtduUAZR5R4mRh4vOyn9gjDYw+3M3+x8ooIP5Xd9MP06ww/DY itZnF90DABiexYoBpC99bp7tkmpUM3g238H5/oLUHEzG/htGA9SQGK4QuxpB8XQ/ WkcutDx0FC14rmite4TxUL1mcepjQ5j2D24HnjBs/AchP0VSS74Omk8hjK+xUDP4 euo+1E9WaHnh9rmVNmjK51Din56hMHtm7RFa3jgXF3ojhzpBQnE= =iQZv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----