Re: out there suggestion...
Roger Knobbe <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:56:10 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.gotmail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Unfortunately, msn.com addresses don't work in outlook express. Msn.com mail, which is hosted by hotmail, was working in gotmail up until the last web page change. On 12/18/03 00:48, Brian Forth wrote: > Since MS changed their hotmail pages that last time that broke gotmail I > have been using OE 6 (6.00.2800.1123)and would like to report there are no > ads in that interface so I can't that being the main driving force behind MS > changing the site on a regular basis. Not being a programmer I can't really > offer any suggestions as to how to fix the perl script but it would seem to > me that since OE doesn't break there has to be some way to get around MS > changing it's site? > > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf > Of John Fruetel > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:27 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gotmail] out there suggestion... > > > I've actually thought about this quite a bit. Gotmail is basically a fancy > 'screen scraper' that looks like a regular user to Hotmail. As such, it's > prone to break every time MS changes the hotmail pages, like what just > happened. > > Paul Cannon, who worked on this project just before I did, also works on > hotwayd. According to Paul, the http mail protocol isn't 100% either. I'd > rather Paul spoke about this, but I got the impression from him that the > http mail protocol isn't a bad of roses either. Although it's not as likely > to break as gotmail is, it has it's own set of problems. > > I write web services all the time at work. In fact, I use the amazon > webservices to test things. I even have a webservice on bigfatdude to check > e-mails for spaminess. > > The problem here is that Microsoft doesn't seem to want to make it easy to > use Hotmail via a webservice. Somebody can correct me if I'm wrong, but as > far as I know http mail is still sorta proprietary to MS and they don't seem > interested in opening it up. They want you to go to the web page to use > hotmail and see all the advertising. In fact, some years ago, Outlook > Express would show the same ads as hotmail when you used OE as a hotmail > client. > > So, I guess I'm agreeing here... There is a lot of 'cross-over' development > happening here. But I think that gotmail might be a little more functional > than hotwayd at the moment. By 'functional', I mean it can do more. But if > hotwayd can indeed do all the low-level functionality that gotmail needs, > I'm all for using it in the future. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben Staniford" <[email protected]> > To: "'E H R'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:00 PM > Subject: RE: [gotmail] out there suggestion... > > > > Hello, > > > > You're not the only one :-) Have you heard of WSDL (Web service > > description language)? Microsoft, Sun and IBM and are all piling loads > > of money into XML based web services for websites (there's open source > > stuff too I think) so that programs don't break when the interface > > changes. The WSDL is stored in a public directory (Like LDAP) so that > > anyone can go and check out the interface and write programs for it. > > There are cool programs for java/perl etc that allow you to auto > > generate a set of classes (called stub classes) for the web services > > interface so all you have to do is call the methods from within your > > program and you can access all the data from the website. You can > > already get these XML interfaces for amazon.com and many others. So, > > once everyone has them, HTML changes won't break things like they do > > now. > > > > Benj.. > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: [email protected] > > [mailto:gotmail- > > >[email protected]] On Behalf Of E H R > > >Sent: 17 December 2003 00:41 > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: [gotmail] out there suggestion... > > > > > >I have a rather large collection of webmails(on different systems) and > > tend > > >to need a whole collection of daemons to run them all, now I was > > looking at > > >one of them(for mail.com) and I remembered that since the hotmail and > > yahoo > > >rebuilds, a lot of work was going on. Now I know the other > > >project(pywebmail) doesn't use the same language as gotmail(perl) but I > > >thought it was interesting it used xml for storing webmail-server > > >behaviour... Could some kind of collaborative effort, perhaps using > > those > > >same xml files, be built, so that there is less duplication of effort > > when > > >hotmail et al decide to make our lives difficult? > > > > > >I've used fetchyahoo, gotmail, mrpostman, hotwayd, web2pop and > > pywebmail(at > > >least) so far, and I did notice that keeping up with the provides is > > >probably the largest part of the update work. > > > > > >Am I the only one who sees a great idea in this ? > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Gotmail-list mailing list > > >[email protected] > > >http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gotmail-list > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gotmail-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gotmail-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gotmail-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gotmail-list > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous > content and is believed to be clean. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous > content and is believed to be clean. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gotmail-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gotmail-list