Re: Re: Unwanted headers

Jason Rennie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ifile.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] said:
> No, because --concise implies --strip-header, which is not what I
> want.  (IMHO --concise should not imply --strip-header because it is a
> mix of grouping unrelated input and output behaviours together.) 

[email protected] said:
> that is correct.  i wasn't even aware of --concise implying
> --strip-header, which is a bad design-decision.  if we get new
> semantics for `-h <headers-to-strip>' and `-H <headers-to-keep>', this
> coupling of orthogonal features should end. 

[email protected] said:
> I third that motion.  Huh.  This means that ifile-gnus hasn't been
> using the xref headers.  Which means I still don't understand why
> refiling some email drops it into the spam group.  Hm.... 

Agreed.  I'll take -h out of the --concise option.  1.1.1 will be heading 
your way soon.

Jason D. M. Rennie
MIT AI Lab
[email protected]
(617) 253-5339
http://www.ai.mit.edu/~jrennie/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.