Re: Effect of widely differing volumes on ifile classification
Jack Bertram <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:51:52 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ifile.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* clemens fischer <[email protected]> [030320 10:57]: > Jack Bertram <[email protected]>: > > > Recently, the rate, which had been consistent for some time, began > > to plunge to about 50% and stayed there, until I deleted .idata and > > rebuilt it from scratch, and it's now classifying better than > > before. (Data attached at bottom for completeness) > > how did you do the re-classification and the initial seeding? you > can't just feed ifile a big mbox with hundreds of emails, it would > have to be split before hand. Well, I actually did it with a modified version of one of Martin Macok's scripts which I've been using, but it's just as easily done with formail -s mbox | ifile -i mbox assuming mboxes and categories are the same (as they are on my system). If one mbox could contain more than one category, then I'd have combined formail with a custom procmail recipe to call ifile with the appropriate category name, based on the header in the message. jack