Re: Re: Large spam-only .idata file available
Preben Randhol <[email protected]> Tue, 6 May 2003 14:42:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ifile.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | PVV |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
clemens fischer <[email protected]> wrote on 06/05/2003 (14:11) : > for example: i'm currently testing bogofilter-0.11.2 (it only does > spam/ham detection, but it also does base64 decoding and it tags IP > addresses), and i have around 16.000 good messages vs. 999 spams in a > database build afresh during the past weeks. this setup gives me > false negatives (quite a few spams categorized as ham). with each new > spam (re-)classified the recision improves. Doesn't bogofilter also have some kind of English dictionary lookup system? Not very useful for me as a lot of the SPAM I get are languages other than English. Anyway I'm quite content with ifile. I get perhaps 2-5 false negatives out of about 25-30 SPAM messages each day. I don't find that bad as I filter mail from 5 high traffic mailinglist and about 10 of low traffic. However I learned that subscribing to the LyX and GTK+ mailinglist and then get sick for 3 days without being able to check my mail and then downloading all in one batch was not such a good idea. I got most of the LyX and Gtk+ mails in my Mutt and Vim folders so "some" was needed work to retrain ifile, but now it works perfectly and it filters all four mailinglist without hickups :-) On the other hand filtering 3Mb of mail was done very fast with ifile. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/