Re: IM2000 Won't Be Worth It

[email protected] wrote:
> Offline: flag 1 and 4 to see what they are really about 
> 
> Dial in: download 1 and 4
> 
> Off line: read 1 and 4.  Both are interesting.  Also, 2 is from an
> ass, while 3 is from Charles, so I just flag 3 from this thread.  Now,
> 5 appears like a duplicate of 4, but let us really see; flag 5.
> 
> Dial in: download 3 and 5.
> 
> Offline: 3 is a response to 2 which is interesting, afterall, but
> Charles quoted only part of it.  Let us flag 2.  5 corrects the
> proposed date for dinner; flag 6.
> 
> Dial in: download 2 and 6.
> 
> Offline: read and answer away. (6 _was_ spam).

Christ, you just turned a 20-second job into something that took at
least 5 minutes. A great leap forward for technology indeed.