Re: Inexpensive anti-spamware/anti-verminware tactic

>[email protected] wrote:
>> > Err, yeah, they have to pay for the outgoing mail instead. 
>> 
>> Presently, they have to store/queue both outgoing and incoming mail.
>
>No, they have to store as-yet-undelivered outgoing mail, which is a
>completely different thing.

Regarding the costs of storing email:

  SMTP (push-style delivery): recipients bear the costs of going on
  vacation.

  IM2000 (pull-style delivery): senders bear the costs of their
  recipients going on vacation.

Hmm.  Guess I'll have to be more careful about sending email to
Europeans, eh?  ;-/

-- 
James Craig Burley
Software Craftsperson
<http://www.jcb-sc.com>