IM2000 is even suited to off-line readers, too.
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Mar 2004 01:35:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wack's Wicks Works |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
M> Think of how you might decide to read a thread on a mailinglist: M> you read the first message, and then you may decide not to even M> look at the other messages in the thread. That's how one decides to read a thread if one has an "always on" connection. The habits of "off-line" users are somewhat different. M> [...] if my mother has to dial up several times during emailing, [...] Then she isn't batching her actions up as "off-line" users usually do, but is rather acting more like an "always on" user. I mentioned in an earlier message a hypothetical recipient MUA tailored for off-line usage that allowed one to go through the list of notifications, marking them variously for "fetch message", "fetch summary", or "refuse", and then to perform all of the requested actions in one go. I should point out that this model isn't all _that_ hypothetical. Netscape Collabra (i.e. the Usenet reader bit) first obtains summary information for messages and then allows one to mark a set of messages and then download their actual headers and bodies "for off-line reading". The IM2000 off-line recipient MUA model of operation that I've been describing is little more than a trivial extension of this.