Re: IM2000 is even suited to off-line readers, too.

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are really grasping at straws now.  It took "5 minutes" because in his
> description of the process he accounted for the time taken to both download
> _and read_ all of the messages.  Counting download time alone (which is of
> course the orange that you are comparing the apple to), it would still have
> been just a total of "20 seconds".

Wrong. His description included dialling in on a modem many times, and
re-reading message details many times.