Re: IM2000 Won't Be Worth It

Jon Ribbens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> You forgot "100M of outbound email, plus a greatly increased support
> workload and dissatisfaction from customers, due to the increased
> effort required to get to their email".

Jon, you appear to have already decided that the basis of IM2000 (sender
stores undelivered mail instead of recipient) is a failure from the get-go.
That's fine; you're entitled to your opinion.  But in that case, please
unsubscribe from the mailing list and let the rest of us deal with /real/
design issues instead of your continuous stream of straw men and red herrings.
Since you've decided IM2000 cannot work, please let the rest of us get on with
building it.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                           <[email protected]>
GPL'ed software available at:     http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------